<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for thoughts on Christian life from a Reformed, Calvinistic perspective</title>
	<atom:link href="http://paraklesis.com/an_observation/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://paraklesis.com/an_observation</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 02:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Suffering ~ Who&#8217;s to Blame? by Rebecca LuElla Miller</title>
		<link>http://paraklesis.com/an_observation/2008/08/suffering-whos-to-blame/#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca LuElla Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 22:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paraklesis.com/an_observation/?p=62#comment-87</guid>
		<description>As you know, I'm one of those who holds to all three positions.  :nod: I think they are present in Scripture. 

But also, the overriding fact is, God is good. So whether or not my car breaks down because I've sinned, because I live in a fallen world, or because Satan is attacking me, I can also know God will graciously work out the circumstances for my good—good defined as conforming me to the image of His Son, a la Romans 8:&lt;b&gt;29&lt;/b&gt;. 

Becky

Rebecca LuElla Millers last blog post..&lt;a href="http://rebeccaluellamiller.wordpress.com/2008/08/28/drying-up-%E2%80%93-a-writer-runs-out-of-words/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Drying Up – A Writer Runs Out of Words&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you know, I&#8217;m one of those who holds to all three positions.  <img src='http://paraklesis.com/an_observation/wp-includes/images/smilies/yes.gif' alt=':nod:' class='wp-smiley' /> I think they are present in Scripture. </p>
<p>But also, the overriding fact is, God is good. So whether or not my car breaks down because I&#8217;ve sinned, because I live in a fallen world, or because Satan is attacking me, I can also know God will graciously work out the circumstances for my good—good defined as conforming me to the image of His Son, a la Romans 8:<b>29</b>. </p>
<p>Becky</p>
<p>Rebecca LuElla Millers last blog post..<a href="http://rebeccaluellamiller.wordpress.com/2008/08/28/drying-up-%E2%80%93-a-writer-runs-out-of-words/" rel="nofollow">Drying Up – A Writer Runs Out of Words</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Suffering ~ Who&#8217;s to Blame? by Suzan</title>
		<link>http://paraklesis.com/an_observation/2008/08/suffering-whos-to-blame/#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator>Suzan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 17:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paraklesis.com/an_observation/?p=62#comment-86</guid>
		<description>I'm enjoying this topic, Sally, thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m enjoying this topic, Sally, thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Northern Light by Suzan</title>
		<link>http://paraklesis.com/an_observation/2008/08/a-northern-light/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>Suzan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 16:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paraklesis.com/an_observation/?p=58#comment-75</guid>
		<description>Or a caged bird, huh? I hate to see birds in cages with clipped wings. Makes me sad.

Great post, Sally. I read a book recently that was anti-Christian and it had some great elements that could have been improved by leaving out the bias. It was Octavia Butler's "The Parable of the Sower."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or a caged bird, huh? I hate to see birds in cages with clipped wings. Makes me sad.</p>
<p>Great post, Sally. I read a book recently that was anti-Christian and it had some great elements that could have been improved by leaving out the bias. It was Octavia Butler&#8217;s &#8220;The Parable of the Sower.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Open Theism is Really Not Logical, Of Course by sally apokedak</title>
		<link>http://paraklesis.com/an_observation/2008/05/46/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>sally apokedak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 23:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paraklesis.com/an_observation/?p=46#comment-43</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt;&gt;how He should communicate with those who are not.&lt;&lt;&lt;

This is the key, I think. 

God is not trying, in that passage, to teach us that he's limited in knowledge. 

To say so would be like going to Jesus' story of the Good Samaritan and saying, "he said, 'by chance' the man was was walking down the street, therefore Jesus affirms that some things happen by chance." That's not what Jesus was saying. That story was not a lesson in whether or not God was sovereign. 

And neither is the story of Abraham's obedience about whether or not God knows all things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>>>>how He should communicate with those who are not.<<<</p>
<p>This is the key, I think. </p>
<p>God is not trying, in that passage, to teach us that he&#8217;s limited in knowledge. </p>
<p>To say so would be like going to Jesus&#8217; story of the Good Samaritan and saying, &#8220;he said, &#8216;by chance&#8217; the man was was walking down the street, therefore Jesus affirms that some things happen by chance.&#8221; That&#8217;s not what Jesus was saying. That story was not a lesson in whether or not God was sovereign. </p>
<p>And neither is the story of Abraham&#8217;s obedience about whether or not God knows all things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Open Theism is Really Not Logical, Of Course by Rebecca LuElla Miller</title>
		<link>http://paraklesis.com/an_observation/2008/05/46/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca LuElla Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 18:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://paraklesis.com/an_observation/?p=46#comment-42</guid>
		<description>Well, just as plainly as God is omniscient, omnipotent, omnipresent, He is eternal, which means He rules time and is therefore outside it.

And clearly, that "now I know" statement about Abraham is for our benefit. It's like prayer. God doesn't need us to inform Him of what we need. But He wants that communication, He wants that obedience, and we benefit. So with Abraham. 

God knew what Abraham would do, but in the doing, it was obedience completed, worship offered, not thought about. Abraham benefited and so did Isaac. 

He saw his father's faith. As Hebrews shows, Abraham believed God would raise his son from the dead. He didn't think, I have to obey which means God isn't going to keep His promise. He thought, I have to obey AND God will still miraculously keep His promise.

We get too caught up in trying to understand God from our perspective, I think. We have no idea how one operates who is omniscient or how He should communicate with those who are not.

To take a verse like that and think it contradicts the host of others that tell us God does in fact know ... well, Pastor Martin has indeed slipped. I mean look at Jesus. He knew there would be a gold coin in the mouth of a fish, knew over and over again what the Pharisees thought and planned, knew  Peter would deny Him ... three times ... before the &lt;b&gt;second&lt;/b&gt; crow of the rooster. And on and on. He demonstrated his omniscience so completely

Becky

Rebecca LuElla Millers last blog post..&lt;a href="http://rebeccaluellamiller.wordpress.com/2008/05/29/the-s-word/" rel="nofollow"&gt;The “S” Word&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, just as plainly as God is omniscient, omnipotent, omnipresent, He is eternal, which means He rules time and is therefore outside it.</p>
<p>And clearly, that &#8220;now I know&#8221; statement about Abraham is for our benefit. It&#8217;s like prayer. God doesn&#8217;t need us to inform Him of what we need. But He wants that communication, He wants that obedience, and we benefit. So with Abraham. </p>
<p>God knew what Abraham would do, but in the doing, it was obedience completed, worship offered, not thought about. Abraham benefited and so did Isaac. </p>
<p>He saw his father&#8217;s faith. As Hebrews shows, Abraham believed God would raise his son from the dead. He didn&#8217;t think, I have to obey which means God isn&#8217;t going to keep His promise. He thought, I have to obey AND God will still miraculously keep His promise.</p>
<p>We get too caught up in trying to understand God from our perspective, I think. We have no idea how one operates who is omniscient or how He should communicate with those who are not.</p>
<p>To take a verse like that and think it contradicts the host of others that tell us God does in fact know &#8230; well, Pastor Martin has indeed slipped. I mean look at Jesus. He knew there would be a gold coin in the mouth of a fish, knew over and over again what the Pharisees thought and planned, knew  Peter would deny Him &#8230; three times &#8230; before the <b>second</b> crow of the rooster. And on and on. He demonstrated his omniscience so completely</p>
<p>Becky</p>
<p>Rebecca LuElla Millers last blog post..<a href="http://rebeccaluellamiller.wordpress.com/2008/05/29/the-s-word/" rel="nofollow">The “S” Word</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
